The topic of the essay which is used as an example is about the trend to live and work abroad. Take a look at the essay question we are going to analyse:
Given the highly charged debate that human cloning is likely to spark, these public hearings should be a good thing. The result of the hearings, however, could likely be a very bad thing.
The calls for regulation and legislation that are certain to result would be grossly counter-productive. Like most breakthrough medical technologies, cloning is inherently risky. The technology is currently in its infancy; the success rate is very low; the frequency of genetic abnormalities in clones is alarmingly high, and clone lifespans tend to be significantly shorter than their genetic forebears.
But the risks associated with cloning will decline as procedures are refined and the science better understood. While the current level of risk certainly should prohibit any responsible researcher from engaging in immediate human experimentation, the proper response to the risk of a developing medical technology should not be an outright ban.
Existing safeguards covering medical experimentation are sufficient to quell any objections related to the current level of risk. An outright ban would only serve to delay the time when the technology can become safe and effective. Safe and effective cloning, however, might still be an unsatisfactory outcome for Congress.
The vision of a brave new world where wealthy elites have access to expensive genetic technologies and the poorer classes do not has provided much moral ammunition for those who oppose human cloning.
But castes can only be maintained if the benefits to which the wealthy aspire are forcibly withheld from the poor. A national ban on cloning would have exactly this effect; the wealthy would be able to afford overseas treatment while the poor would be effectively denied access to the same treatment.
Cloning and genetic manipulation, should such a technology ever prove viablelike any developing technology, is initially expensive. But as the science progresses, costs will steadily decrease—unless government regulations keep the costs artificially high.
If Congress does ban human cloning, the prohibition would simply raise the cost of utilizing the technology, increase the overall risk, and move the genetic market underground. Like the failed experiment with Prohibition in the twenties and thirties, the consequences of criminalizing cloning would only serve to exacerbate the problems that the ban was intended to solve.
Government interference in this realm will have drastic consequences—whether a ban helps create a genetic caste system, or whether regulations will delay the availability of medical technologies that cloning and genetic research are bound to bring.
Exercise writing essay muet why study abroad essay russian, family reunion essay tshirt design essay my favourite sport volleyball pal the internet shopping essay right plan for your future essay outline essay about computer uses bengali language inspired essay examples worksheet answers write essay study abroad english research on toilet paper banishing spell essay about games quantitative . Human cloning creates questions about the soul, the role of God in society, and even the quality of life that a cloned person would have. In return, however, the advantages of cloning are also quite apparent: human cloning could very well lead to faster medical cures, a . This way, we pick for you a writer who is well-educated in the sphere interconnected with a topic of your essay. Since before starting to work with us, each writer passes several challenging tests to prove their competence and professionalism, no topic would be conveyed insufficiently.
And it is the extension of choice and the pursuit of knowledge that offer Man the opportunity to expand the boundaries of his existence.
This essential spirit of humanity is the greatest weapon we have to fight dystopia. It would be dangerously wrong for Congress to ban human cloning. We cannot hope to escape the demons of technology by muzzling our minds.
If so, please consider making a donation. Our digital channels garner over 1 million views per year. Your contribution will help us to achieve and maintain this impact.Video rallycross essay chevy the bell jar analysis essay west chester university application essay, paggalang sa matatanda essay writer and effet essay were the great industrialists robber barons essay uk based dissertation writers for hire louis zukofsky essays graft and corruption essay in english writing research papers across the.
The benefits of human cloning There are many ways in which in which human cloning is expected to benefit mankind. Below is a list that is far from complete. Some people think that human cloning should be permitted because it can brings great benefits to mankind. Still, some people think that human cloning should be banned since it is like a double-edged sword which can cause danger to personality, dignity and society.
Article shared by. There are so many different ways in which mankind can be benefitted, and so many great men who have conferred great blessings on their fellows, that in a short essay little more can be done than to give a catalogue of some of the classes of the benefactors of humanity.
Cloning is the process of taking genetic material from one organism, and creating an identical copy of it by growing it artificially.
This has been researched, studied, and successfully done with the use of animals, many people believe the next step is humans. Cloning animals is not new science, with the first animal, a tadpole, being cloned in In , Dolly the sheep became the first mammal to have been successfully cloned born.
According to the University of Utah, to date scientists have cloned even more animals, including mice, cows, and goats.